<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>intellichick.com &#124; cc.tran &#187; marriage equality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intellichick.com/index.php/tag/marriage-equality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intellichick.com</link>
	<description>writer. singer/songwriter. techie geek. princess of random.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 06:11:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>No Exceptions: Marriage Equality</title>
		<link>http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/10/16/no-exceptions-marriage-equality/</link>
		<comments>http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/10/16/no-exceptions-marriage-equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 06:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cct</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interracial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intellichick.com/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><em>The U.S. Supreme Court tossed out any racially based limitations on marriage in the landmark 1967 Loving v. Virginia case. In the unanimous decision, the court said that &#8220;Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person</em>&#8230; <a href="http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/10/16/no-exceptions-marriage-equality/" class="read_more">Read the rest</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/10/16/no-exceptions-marriage-equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Empty Spaces: A Reflection on Interracial Relationships In My Life</title>
		<link>http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/10/15/empty-spaces-a-reflection-on-interracial-relationships-in-my-life/</link>
		<comments>http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/10/15/empty-spaces-a-reflection-on-interracial-relationships-in-my-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cct</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[couples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huffington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interracial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex couples]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intellichick.com/?p=511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today a news article about an interracial marriage being denied by a Louisiana Justice of the Peace circulated the internet (<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/interracial-couple-denied_n_322784.html">See Huffington Post</a>).  You can read the article; it&#8217;s sentiments need not be repeated here.  It&#8217;s been less than&#8230; <a href="http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/10/15/empty-spaces-a-reflection-on-interracial-relationships-in-my-life/" class="read_more">Read the rest</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/10/15/empty-spaces-a-reflection-on-interracial-relationships-in-my-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buy &#8220;So Special&#8221;: Proceeds to go to Equality California</title>
		<link>http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/05/30/buy-so-special-proceeds-to-go-to-equality-california/</link>
		<comments>http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/05/30/buy-so-special-proceeds-to-go-to-equality-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 21:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cct</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Original Songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proceeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[so special]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intellichick.com/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATED: <a href="http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/06/04/updated-buy-cctrans-song-so-special-proceeds-for-marriage-equality/" target="_self">I have changed the location where you can purchase the song.  Please refer to the updated blog post on this</a>!</strong></p>
<p>I have just released my &#8220;So Special&#8221; song on SnoCap. Because the song is about my take&#8230; <a href="http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/05/30/buy-so-special-proceeds-to-go-to-equality-california/" class="read_more">Read the rest</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/05/30/buy-so-special-proceeds-to-go-to-equality-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressive Regressive: Marriage Equality</title>
		<link>http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/05/27/progressive-regressive-marriage-equality/</link>
		<comments>http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/05/27/progressive-regressive-marriage-equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cct</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonia sotomayor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intellichick.com/?p=237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been feeling this odd back-and-forth pull in federal politics versus state level politics (in my particular case &#8211; California&#8217;s).  It seems as if &#8211; perhaps by chance &#8211; the progressive changes on the federal level is met by regressive&#8230; <a href="http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/05/27/progressive-regressive-marriage-equality/" class="read_more">Read the rest</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://intellichick.com/index.php/2009/05/27/progressive-regressive-marriage-equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
